ChatGPT Monitoring
Comprehensive monitoring of OpenAI's ChatGPT censorship patterns, content policy enforcement, and behavioral changes.
Current Status
| Metric | Value | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Censorship Rate | 18.7% | Rising |
| Political Topic Refusals | 34.2% | Rising |
| Safety Topic Refusals | 68.4% | Stable |
Versions Monitored
- GPT-4o (latest)
- GPT-4 Turbo
- GPT-4
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
Key Findings
Q4 2024 Highlights
- 47% Increase in Political Censorship - Significant rise in refusal rates for politically sensitive topics since Q2 2024
- Content Policy Expansion - New categories of restricted topics detected
- Behavioral Drift - Subtle changes between model versions
- Regional Consistency - Unlike Gemini, ChatGPT shows minimal regional variation
Censorship by Category
| Category | Refusal Rate | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Political Opinion | 34.2% | Rising |
| Historical Events | 28.7% | Rising |
| Violence/Safety | 68.4% | Stable |
| Adult Content | 94.7% | Stable |
| Medical/Legal | 32.1% | Rising |
| Controversial Topics | 45.3% | Rising |
Historical Trends
Censorship Rate Over Time
| Period | Rate | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2024 | 12.3% | Baseline |
| Q2 2024 | 15.8% | +28% |
| Q3 2024 | 18.2% | +47% |
| Q4 2024 | 18.7% | +52% |
Notable Policy Changes
- March 2024: Enhanced safety guidelines for election-related content
- June 2024: Stricter enforcement on controversial historical topics
- September 2024: New restrictions on speculative political scenarios
- November 2024: Updated medical advice refusal patterns
Response Patterns
Typical Refusal Behaviors
- Direct Refusal - "I can't help with that"
- Redirect - Offers alternative topics
- Partial Answer - Provides limited information with caveats
- Safety Hedge - Answers with extensive warnings
Refusal Distribution
| Response Type | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Direct Refusal | 42.3% |
| Redirect | 23.7% |
| Partial Answer | 21.4% |
| Safety Hedge | 12.6% |
Comparison with Other Models
| Model | Censorship Rate | Most Restrictive Category |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 18.7% | Political Opinion |
| Claude | 22.4% | Safety/Violence |
| Gemini | 19.8% | Regional Content |
| Mistral | 11.2% | Adult Content |
| Qwen | 24.6% | Political Topics |
Methodology
Testing Protocol
- Daily testing with standardized prompt library
- 500+ prompts across 12 categories
- Multiple sessions to account for variance
- Version tracking for each response
- Semantic analysis for response classification
Scoring Metrics
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Refusal Score | 0-100 likelihood of refusal |
| Evasion Score | 0-100 topic avoidance |
| Bias Score | -100 to +100 ideological leaning |
| Completeness | 0-100 answer fullness |
API Access
Get Current Metrics
curl -X GET "https://api.gptfake.com/v1/monitoring/chatgpt/metrics" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Get Historical Data
curl -X GET "https://api.gptfake.com/v1/monitoring/chatgpt/history?period=30d" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Response Example
{
"model": "chatgpt",
"version": "gpt-4o",
"timestamp": "2024-11-26T12:00:00Z",
"metrics": {
"censorship_rate": 18.7,
"political_refusals": 34.2,
"safety_refusals": 68.4,
"bias_score": 12.3
},
"trend": {
"direction": "rising",
"change_30d": "+2.4%"
}
}
Research Resources
Related Studies
- ChatGPT Censorship Trends Analysis Q4 2024
- Longitudinal Study: GPT Model Evolution
- Comparative Bias Analysis
Data Access
Last Updated: November 2024
Questions? Contact info@gptfake.com